Talk:BASIC countries

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Stub‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Based in IBSA?

The BASIC grouping may have been based on IBSA, but the below suggested text (by me) needs more evidence to support that hypothesis. Anyone?

In 2008, the India-Brazil-South Africa Dialogue Forum, a tri-partite grouping of India, Brazil and South Africa, was urged by a South African economist to join with China as an economic bloc.^[1]

Earthlyreason (talk) 16:32, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Nieuwoudt, Stephanie (13 Oct 2008). "India, Brazil and South Africa Should Gang Up With China". Inter Press Service news agency. Retrieved 25 Jan 2010.

"G4 Bloc" article and this one

This article is based on cited references to the formation of this grouping directly prior to the Copenhagen summit in December 2009.

At the time I created it, I also proposed the "G4 Bloc" article for deletion. It referred to the same four countries but I don't believe it is a valid term. After four years in existence the article had no references. Moreover, I can find no mention of 'G4 Bloc' in any major publication (eg. The Times, the New York Times, The Economist). And a web search just throws up mirrors of the Wikipedia article. (I explained this reasoning on that article's Talk page.)

So when a well-meaning user merged that article and this, 27 Jan 10, the old problem was compounded.

Therefore I have (manually) reverted those two edits, without recreating the former 'G4 Bloc' article.

If anyone can justify an article on 'G4 Bloc', whether for the "core leadership of the G20" or anything else, or possibly link it to the BASIC grouping, please either do so with references, or discuss here, or both. Thanks everyone.
Earthlyreason (talk) 15:39, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find any reliable source that uses the term G4 for this group, so I have removed it from the article. If someone wants to add it back, please provide a RS. 87.113.37.75 (talk) 12:19, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

resource

India Says Basic Countries Are ‘Not Major Polluters’ by Alessandro Vitelli Bloomberg.com Dec 6, 2011 7:44 AM ET 99.190.82.160 (talk) 07:22, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, the major polluters would never admit it, like criminals never blame oneself in court. This is no resource, this is just a lame excuse. --93.135.54.194 (talk) 19:00, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BrASIC?

Obviously this acronym is based on the initial characters. And obviously someone doesn't like the correct acronym BRASIC for BrAzil, South Africa, India and China and preferred the wrong spelling for a little double entendre with the word basic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.135.54.194 (talk) 18:56, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why should one country get more letters than the others..? CapnZapp (talk) 13:19, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the A of BASIC

Do we have a ref spelling out the acronym?

I could understand if there was five countries and,say, Argentina was the second... CapnZapp (talk) 13:17, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BASIC countries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100206141441/http://www.hindustantimes.com:80/Copenhagen-accord-not-legally-binding-Basic-countries/H1-Article3-501441.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/Copenhagen-accord-not-legally-binding-Basic-countries/H1-Article3-501441.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Nieuwoudt, Stephanie (13 Oct 2008). "India, Brazil and South Africa Should Gang Up With China". Inter Press Service news agency. Retrieved 25 Jan 2010.

[1]